首页> 外文OA文献 >Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Resistant and Susceptible Wheat to Injury by Russian Wheat Aphid
【2h】

Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Resistant and Susceptible Wheat to Injury by Russian Wheat Aphid

机译:小麦抗蚜和抗性小麦对伤害的生理生化响应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We examined the physiological and biochemical responses of resistant (“Halt” and “Prairie Red”) and susceptible (“TAM 107”) wheat, Triticum aestivum L., to injury by the Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Mordvilko). Photosynthetic capacity was evaluated by measuring assimilation/ internal CO2 (A/Ci) curves, chlorophyll fluorescence, chlorophyll, and nonstructural carbohydrate content. Total protein and peroxidase specific activity also were determined. No significant differences were detected in chlorophyll concentration between aphid-infested and control TAM107 plants. The aphid-infested resistant cultivars had similar or significantly higher chlorophyll concentrations compared with their respective control plants. Measurements over time showed that infested Halt plants had delays in photosynthetic senescence, Prairie Red plants had photosynthetic rate changes that were similar to control plants, and TAM 107 plants displayed accelerated photosynthetic senescence patterns. The photochemical and nonphotochemical quenching coefficients were significantly higher in infested Halt plants compared with their respective control plants on day 3. Infested TAM 107 plants had significantly higher photochemical quenching compared with control plants at all times evaluated, and they had significantly higher nonphotochemical quenching on day 3. Throughout the experiment, infested Prairie Red plants exhibited photochemical and nonphotochemical quenching coefficient values that were not significantly different from control plants. Total protein content was not significantly different between aphid-infested and control plants for all cultivars. Differences between physiological responses of infested susceptible and resistant cultivars, particularly temporal changes in photosynthetic activity, imply that resistant Halt and Prairie Red wheat tolerate some impacts of aphid injury on photosynthetic integrity.
机译:我们研究了抗性小麦(“ Halt”和“草原红”)和易感小麦(“ TAM 107”)小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)对俄罗斯小麦蚜虫Diuraphis noxia(Mordvilko)的伤害的生理和生化反应。通过测量同化/内部CO2(A / Ci)曲线,叶绿素荧光,叶绿素和非结构性碳水化合物含量来评估光合能力。还测定了总蛋白和过氧化物酶的比活性。在蚜虫侵染的TAM107植物和对照TAM107植物之间,叶绿素浓度没有发现显着差异。与它们各自的对照植物相比,被蚜虫侵染的抗性品种的叶绿素浓度相似或明显更高。随着时间的推移,测量结果表明,受侵染的Halt植物的光合衰老有所延迟,草原红植物的光合速率变化与对照植物相似,而TAM 107植物的光合衰老速度加快。在第3天,受侵染的Halt植物的光化学和非光化学猝灭系数显着高于其相应的对照植物。在所有评估的时间中,受侵染的TAM 107植物的光化学猝灭性均高于对照植物,并且它们在当天的非光化学猝灭显着更高。 3.在整个实验过程中,受感染的草原红植物的光化学和非光化学猝灭系数值与对照植物没有显着差异。在所有品种中,蚜虫侵染和对照植物的总蛋白含量均无显着差异。受侵染的易感和抗病品种的生理反应之间的差异,尤其是光合活性的暂时变化,表明抗性的Halt和草原红小麦可以忍受蚜虫伤害对光合完整性的一些影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号